The intersection of karma-yoga and bhakti-yoga


Greetings Reader,

I get a lot of questions from yoga teachers about how to explain karma-yoga — the yoga of liberation through action.

And I frequently get asked for advice on how to speak about bhakti-yoga, the yoga of devotion, in yoga classes.

Speaking about karma-yoga is challenging because it seems impossible to act in the world without generating some kind of reaction.

Speaking about bhakti-yoga can be tricky because yoga is not a religion but bhakti is theistic by definition.

But what happens when you put karma-yoga and bhakti-yoga together?

This verse from the Bhagavad Gita speaks to the idea that the ultimate goal of karma-yoga, liberation, can be only be reached by adding bhakti: devotion to a personal form of Divinity

"Act only for the sake of offering your actions to Viṣṇu, free from attachment, for by such perfect action you will be liberated from all reactions associated with your deeds. Otherwise, your actions will bind you to this material world." - Bg 3.9

Offering your actions to God definitely makes yoga sound like a religion, perhaps even a sectarian religion since “Viṣṇu” implies Hinduism.

It also sounds dangerous, as if it doesn't matter what you do as long as you're doing it for God.

“Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.” - Blaise Pascal

Yoga teachers who want to speak about bhakti in their classes justifiably assume that most of their students are not coming to their classes to hear about God. But some of them may be interested to learn how to act in the world without generating a karmic reaction.

In the interest of playing it safe or simply due to a poor fund of knowledge, many teachers opt for modern interpretations of bhakti that employ all manner of evasive maneuvers to avoid acknowledging the centrality of a Supreme Being in bhakti-yoga.

And all too often, karma-yoga gets reduced to providing someone with free labor or donating your time to some worthy cause or, at best, the unattainable ideal of action without attachment, as if it were possible to do anything without being motivated by something.

My advise is always to stick with the traditional understandings of karma-yoga and bhakti-yoga. A good way to do that is to talk about them in relationship to one another. This approach doesn’t just honor the wisdom tradition from which yoga comes; it provides us with a philosophically sound approach to connecting yoga wisdom to current events.

I’m not saying this is easy. On the contrary, the idea of karma may sound simple at first — what goes around comes around — but it’s actually one of the most complex elements of yoga philosophy.

One reason why it’s so complicated is because the concept of karma is so tightly intertwined with other aspects of yogic metaphysics, such as the gunas: the three modes of material nature — illumination, passion, and darkness.

Bhakti is also a rich and complex topic. It's not just devotional sentimentality nor is it a specific set of rituals and doctrines that apply to only one form of faith; it’s a nuanced aesthetic philosophy that supports the development of God consciousness in ways that can be applied to a wide variety of faith forms.

And, according to yoga wisdom, action in — or in pursuit of — God consciousness doesn't generate a karmic reaction.

How can we tell genuine devotion that doesn’t generate a karmic reaction from pseudo-religiosity that does?

This is where the three modes of material nature come in:

“Discernment by which one can distinguish between constructive engagement and disengagement, what should be done and what should not to be done, what is to be feared and what is not to be feared, what is binding and what is liberating, is discernment in the mode of luminance."
"Discernment by which one cannot correctly distinguish between principles of religion and principles of irreligion, between action that should be taken and action that should not be taken, is discernment in the mode of passion."
"Discernment by which one considers irreligious principles to be religious principles and religious principles to be irreligious principles, that is encased by a shroud of illusion, and that sees things as the opposite of what they really are, is discernment in the mode of darkness.” - Bg 18.30-32

Here are three examples of discernment in the mode of darkness and how to look at them through the lens of guna, karma and bhakti:

  • The Military Religious Freedom Foundation has received over 200 complaints from U.S. service members alleging that military commanders have been framing the conflict with Iran as a "biblically sanctioned" mission that foreshadows “the imminent return of Jesus Christ.”
  • The Iranian clerical establishment’s atrocities in response to the protests that preceded the current attacks was just the latest in a long history of human rights abuses and cruelty towards Iranian citizens that was rationalized by a radical and politicized interpretation of Shia Islam.
  • Jewish settlers in the West Bank are driven by a messianic ideology that views the West Bank as a God-given ancestral inheritance. They believe settling this land is a divine command that justifies using violence to displace Palestinians and establish "greater Israel."

The details of how these are all examples of religion in the mode of darkness are beyond the scope of this email. Suffice it to say that the inability to distinguish “between action that should be taken and action that should not be taken” tells us that this kind of mis-directed and de-humanizing devotion is a sure-fire formula for generating negative karmic reactions, otherwise known as bad karma.

For devotional action to be properly directed, it must, at the very least, be aligned with action in the mode of illumination. Knowing the difference between “what is binding and what is liberating” is the obvious pre-requisite for liberating action.

So how can teachers speak about the intersection of karma-yoga and bhakti-yoga in a yoga class? Try something like this:

Most of the time, our actions are all about moving the world into alignment with our desires. Our desires may be altruistic or selfish, but either way, if they're based on our attachments and aversions then our actions will generate an unavoidable karmic reaction of one kind or another.
Yoga wisdom advises us to let go of our attachment to the results of our actions, but not to action itself. The Bhagavad Gita tells us that it’s not possible to be inactive, even for a moment, so the real question is, "How can I engage in action without generating a reaction?"
The Gita’s answer is to offer our actions to the highest truth or Highest Truth that we can conceive of. If we act within the ethical framework of yoga — distinguishing between constructive engagement and disengagement in accordance with the quality of luminance — and devote our actions to whatever conception of a Supreme Consciousness we relate to, then letting go of our attachment to the results of our actions has already been achieved.
In other words, offering ethical actions and their results to the Supreme Consciousness is a spiritual activity; it appears to be happening in the material world — the jurisdiction of the law of karma — but because we're acting in spiritual consciousness, our actions take place outside the jurisdiction of the law of karma and therefore don't generate any reaction.
If we think of our asana practice as a way to maintain our minds and bodies with the intention of dedicating our actions off the mat to the Highest Truth we can conceive of, then our actions on the mat take on a spiritual character that can put us on the path to liberation.

By framing karma-yoga as the path of action without reaction and bhakti-yoga as a non-sectarian culture of devotion, we can talk about how they work together as a twin path to liberation and God consciousness in a way that honors the yoga wisdom tradition without sounding like a preacher.

What do you think? Has this helped you think differently about karma-yoga and bhakti-yoga or see how to connect them to current events in a relatable way? Write back and let me know.

Wishing you all good fortune,

- Hari-k

P.S.: My next live online workshop, Love in Action: A Bhakti Framework for Responding to Hate, will be on Saturday, March 14th. This workshop is for yoga teachers and wellness guides who care about social justice — especially those who refuse to choose between grounded inner work and meaningful civic engagement but don’t want to turn their classes into political battlegrounds. It’s also for spiritually-minded people and community leaders who want language, principles, and practices they can share without resorting to spiritual bypassing or performative outrage. CLICK HERE for complete information and enrollment.

P.P.S: If you're in the D.C. area, join me this evening at Luneh Yoga for my monthly Yoga Nidra class. The class begins at 5:45 pm. Luneh Yoga is located at 2000 S St NW Suite 100, Washington, D.C. CLICK HERE to register.

Hari-kirtana das

If you’re ready to apply yoga philosophy to your own life—or teach it with clarity and feeling—my classes and workshops create space to sharpen your thinking, steady your inner life, and connect your practice to what matters now.

Read more from Hari-kirtana das
woman in gold dress holding sword figurine

Greetings Reader, Last summer, I posted an Instagram reel about how the principle spiritual equality provides a rational basis for social justice. How so? Materially, none of us are equal. We all have a little more of this or a little less of that and when we add it all up, no one is materially equal to anyone else. Spiritually, however, the yoga wisdom tradition tells us that we are all equal; that we’re all made of the same spiritual stuff and that we are all equally infinitesimal parts of...

a close up of a diamond ring on a blue velvet

Greetings Reader, My latest rationalization for not pulling my phone away from my nose? Watching reels of musicians explaining the brilliance of the Beatles. It’s fun to learn what makes their songs so great. And it’s nice to see that these reels are coming from relatively young musicians, not my antediluvian contemporaries with memories of Beatlemania. One of the many ways that the Beatles upended the rules of pop songwriting was by opening songs with the chorus instead of a verse. The most...

a large group of white and black letters

Greetings Reader, Did I ever tell you that I used to be a soda pop salesman? It’s true. Back in 1981, I got a job as a sales rep for a very small company with a tiny office in lower Manhattan. Their flagship product was the first all-natural soda pop to hit the health food market. My job was to sell soda pop to independent grocery stores around the city and health food stores around the country. There were only five people working out of that office. Of those five, I was the only man. I was...